Archive | 2005

Yet another IE exploit…

Slashdot posting: Several Critical MSIE Flaws Uncovered. An anonymous reader writes “Several flaws have been uncovered by security firm eEye in Microsoft’s Internet Explorer. The flaws allow remote compromise of computers running Windows Operating Systems and affect IE, Outlook and possibly other MS software. With the next MS Windows security bulletin release scheduled for June 14, 2005 news sources are reporting that in comparison with the Mozilla Foundation’s prompt fix for the recently reported Mozilla 1.0.3 vulnerabilities MS appear to be leaving a large window for the possible malicious exploitation of these flaws.”

Of course, if Microsoft can come up with a patch, successfully test it against the many configurations it supports, and feels the threat of the exploit actually appear in the wild, I would expect them to release it. With Mozilla having delivered several quick turn-arounds on security patches, Microsoft has their work cut out for it: a quick response is required, but an admission of insecurity, and a huge liability if it fails (imagine a patch the brings down a large number of machines). If the release is not quickly forthcoming, Microsoft has an opportunity to downplay the threat, especially if it is more theoretical than something actually found in the wild. Playing the numbers game, if the release can beat out the exploit, Microsoft gets to claim they are taking care of their customers their best One Microsoft Way. But… if the exploit hits the street… if the exploit is nasty enough… another mess like Melissa or SQL Slammer will cost their customers millions of dollars of clean-up. Their customers have spent these millions before, and they will likely spend them again. But Microsoft plays a very dangerous game in dealing with security as a PR management process rather than a security issue to be dealt with out delay. Looking forward to learning more details on this problem, and watching Microsoft’s response.

Firefox updated to 1.0.4

A Slashdot post notes Firefox Updated to 1.0.4. Exstatica writes “Firefox has been updated to 1.0.4 and they have fixed a few critical security holes, all javascript vulnerabilities. The Mozilla Foundation announced these vulnerabilities May 7th. ‘There are currently no known active exploits of these vulnerabilities although a proof of concept has been reported.” You don’t have to upgrade, but it’s recommended.'” We’ve reported on these vulnerabilities previously.”

Roof! Roof!

Getting a new roof this week, and a new chimney. Our wound-up little dogs are not pleased. Needless to say, neither are Laura nor I. It’s pandemonium this week. Hope to blog more once I’ve regained my sanity.

SveaSoft releases Alchemy 1.0

A Slashdot blogger notes that Sveasoft releases Alchemy 1.0, an updated firmware image for the LinkSys WRT54G family of wireless routers. There’s been a lot of controversy with Sveasoft charging a subscription fee for access to the beta development forums for the software, which is a mixture of Linux software, modifications by LinkSys, and original development by SveaSoft. There have been a lot of charges on both sides of theft, DMCA violations, copyright and license infringement. It’s disappointing seeing so much controversy surrounding such a great project.

Another Sale Lost Because of Internet Explorer

I was shopping for some printing services, and started on the Staples web site. It redirected me to their partner, “Mark The World.” I clicked on the product I was interested in, and was greeted with the message:

The web browser you are using is incompatible

We are sorry for the inconvenience. Our site currently supports only Internet Explorer version 4.0 and 5.0. This is due to the advanced features used in the real-time designer.

We are working to support Netscape in the very near future. If you do not have Internet Explorer, it may be downloaded for free at Microsoft’s website here.

How incredibly ignorant! My web browser is not incompatible. Mark the World’s web site is incompatible with industry standard browsers. What a terrible way to treat a potential customer! Kicking out customers running Safari, FireFox, Camino, Konqueror, Opera or Nautilus because Mark The World choose to go with the least secure web browser is such poor customer service. Blame the customer. Get a clue, MTW. It’s about choice. At the least, they should gracefully offer alternative services for those who prefer not to use their recommendation of browsers. I’ll take my business elsewhere.

Capture the Broadcast Flag game — a win for consumers!

CNet reports “The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled Friday that the Federal Communications Commission did not have the authority to prohibit the manufacture of computer and video hardware that doesn’t have copy protection technology known as the “broadcast flag.”

Great news. Now just keep an eye on the legislature to make sure they don’t re-implement this infringement on our rights to record for private use, time-shift or space-shift our consumption of the media. Next, seat belts that won’t unlock during commercials!

OS X Spotlight doesn’t search OpenOffice documents

Shame on Apple for shipping their Spotlight desktop search engine with support for MS Office, but no support for searching OpenOffice.org documents. Oo.o documents are ZIPped-up sets of XML documents, and should be a piece of cake to fix.

The Open Source community to the rescue again, with NeoLight, an early beta product now, but planned to be included in future versions of Oo.o, which will add the search capabilities into Spotlight.

With the Oo.o 2.0 document format forming the basis for the OASIS document format I mentioned yesterday, let’s hope we see a pickup in the support for this format around the office automation software industry.

Is agreeing to give something away for free price-fixing?

OSNews points to an article GPL Under “Price Fixing” Legal Attack. “The suit claims that the “Free Software Foundation has entered into contracts and otherwise conspired and agreed with individual software authors and commercial distributors of commodity software products such as Red Hat Inc. and Novell Inc. to artificially fix the prices charged for computer software programs through the promotion and use of an adhesion contract that was created, used and promoted since at least the year 1991 by the Free Software Foundation”

Groklaw responds with a pretty clear interpretation that this is nonsense.

Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes

This work by Ted Roche is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States.