Tag Archives | Microsoft

Internet Explorer losing market share

Internet Explorer loses market share. “Although Microsoft Corp. still dominates the Web browser space, its Internet Explorer continues to lose market share to open-source rival Mozilla.” From InfoWorld: Top News.

Funny thing about a monopoly – it’s likely the only change in popularity could be downward. For Microsoft and IE, the change may seem rather insignificant, tenths of percentage points. But for the FireFox promoters, this means over seven million downloads!. Wow. It’s a pretty slick browser, and I’m using it pretty much exclusively, occasionally resorting to Safari on the Mac. Check it out.

Microsoft EULAs and Benchmarks

Get the Facts on Microsoft Benchmarks. “Now that Steve Ballmer and company have given you all the facts you need to compare Windows and Linux, allow me to add just one little tidbit.” Posted at Ed Foster’s Gripelog

Windows v. Linux security: the real facts

Operating System Security, a Clear Winner.

  • Nicholas Petreley (The Register): Windows v Linux security: the real facts. “Reliance on a single metrics is a major feature of Microsoft’s Get the Facts campaign, and this is perhaps understandable if we consider what the campaign is. It is essentially a marketing-driven campaign intended to ‘get the message across’ with data used to back up the message (note that Microsoft would not necessarily disagree with us here). However, by their nature marketing campaigns push specific, favourable headline items and magnify their significance. They do not necessarily (even usually) accurately reflect the underlying data, and frequently outrun it by some distance. And this process is actually easily illustrated by the Forrester report we linked to earlier on. Get the Facts pulls out the 100 per cent fix and fewest vulnerabilities bullets, while the report itself talks of its use of three metrics and (if we’re doing headline items) also says: “ICAT classified 67% of Microsoft’s vulnerabilities as high severity, placing Microsoft dead last among the platform maintainers in this [high severity] metric.”
  • From Dan Gillmor’s eJournal

    Joel Speaks, Microsoft Listens, Mary Jo Queries

    Joel Speaks. Microsoft Listens.. “Joel Spolsky, as in the Joel of “Joel on Software” fame, recently chatted with Microsoft Watch about his now-infamous essay “How Microsoft Lost the API War,” as well as on lots of other items of interest to those in the Microsoft ecosystem.” Link from Microsoft Watch from Mary Jo Foley

    I’ve quoted Joel on this blog and in other forums more than a few times. It looks like an interesting interview…

    Microsoft details seven new patches

    Yes, it’s that time of month again, the second Tuesday, when Microsoft releases their monthly list of patches. Quite a bunch this month, with several patches rated “Critical” with a threat of “Remote Code Execution” (“all your base belong to us.”) Get patching!. Microsoft releases fixes for seven ‘critical’ vulnerabilities. Windows users need to prepare for ‘patch Tuesday,’ analyst says. [Computerworld News]

    Microsoft Patches ASP.Net Problem in Record Time

    Microsoft Patches ASP.Net Problem in Record Time. Two days after it acknowledged a potential security problem with its ASP.Net Web-development platform, Microsoft quietly posted to its Web site for download a fix for the problem. [Microsoft Watch from Mary Jo Foley]

    Bravo.

    Windows server at FAA crashes every 49.7 days unless ‘maintained’ (rebooted)

    Doc Searls asks “Did the air traffic control center really have a “Microsoft server crash”?. This looks like an incredible use of a 32-bit counter of milliseconds that overflows every 49.7 days, without a built-in feature to reset it. The “neglected maintenance” is likely a reboot of the system. Now ask yourself: Do you really want to be at 35,000 feet when they reboot the air traffic control system?

    The list of Microsoft Knowledge base articles that refer to various (or the same) incarnation of this bug are scary:

    SNMP SysUpTime Counter Resets After 49.7 Days

    Computer Hangs After 49.7 Days

    “PING -T” Stops Timing Out After 50 Days

    Print Spooler Stops Scheduling Print Jobs

    The Rpcss.exe process consumes 60 percent of CPU time and performance is affected

    X-Duration Values Are Larger Than Expected in Windows Media Server Log

    Windows 2000 Terminal Services Time-Out Setting Limits

    Contents of the Microsoft Windows 98 System Update

    List of Bugs Fixed in Windows NT 4.0 and Terminal Server Edition Service Pack 4 (Part 1)

    You might be able to spot Microsoft the Windows 95 and 98 systems; who would have ever expected 50-day reliability out of those systems? NT 4.0 is a little more worrisome, as the bug had been documented for some time before the release of NT 4.0, I think. But for Windows 2000? The RPCSS and print spooler bugs are not documented as fixed in a later service pack, but only a hot fix, although this may be a documentation issue. That is truly disturbing if such a known issue is still sitting around to bite programmers.

    I’d really like to know how and why Harris Corporation was allowed to replace UNIX machines that did not have these problems with Windows machines where this was a known issue, and roll them out into the FAA’s production systems, no less. That this was a documented issue is not an acceptable excuse, as the incident last month demonstrated, fortunately without the loss of life.

    Security flaw in older versions of MS Office…

    [CNET News.com]
    is reporting Flaw found in older Office versions.

    “A security company warned Thursday that a flaw in Microsoft Office could allow a denial-of-service attack to be executed on systems running somewhat older versions of the popular productivity suite.

    Secunia issued an advisory saying a buffer overrun flaw has been found in Office 2000, and potentially also in Office XP, that could allow hackers to take over a user’s system. The company rated the flaw as “highly critical.”

    The security firm said that vulnerability is caused by an error in the way Microsoft Word manages input when parsing document files. It said the flaw could be exploited through a specially-crafted document and recommends that, until a fix is found, users only open trusted Word documents. “

    Reminder: only open trusted attachments. Reminder 2: there are no trusted attachments.

    Never open a document you are not expecting. Confirm all unexpected documents with the sender before opening.

    Better yet, send documents as text or RTF if the recipient really doesn’t need all the features of a word processing document.

    I wonder how OpenOffice.org would work with one of these broken documents…

    Another convert to FireFox

    Why I dumped Internet Explorer. “CNET News.com’s Charles Cooper confesses that he’s a Firefox convert and not at all nostalgic for the old days.” From CNET News.com. Great quotes from the article:

    “After months waiting for Microsoft to give me a reason to remain loyal, I finally dumped Internet Explorer for the Firefox Web browser last week.”

    “There is one major change you can ascribe to Internet Explorer: The PC browser world is in much worse shape. Because management took so long to tackle Internet Explorer’s security woes, Microsoft allowed virus writers to exploit vulnerabilities in the browser and wreak untold havoc on unsuspecting computer users.”

    Get Firefox

    CoDE Focus special issue on VFP 9 available for download

    A special issue of CoDE magazine, called CoDE Focus, has been released for VFP 9. I know in the past, Microsoft underwrote these issues, though I don’t know if it is true for this one. Great articles by Doug Hennig, Cathy Pountney, Rod Paddock, David T. Anderson, and more!

    http://www.code-magazine.com/downloads/VFP9Focus.pdf

    Powered by WordPress. Designed by Woo Themes

    This work by Ted Roche is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States.